Poly Voyager 4320 vs Monster Mission 200
Updated: Dec 2, 2025
Disclosure: This page contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you make a purchase, at no additional cost to you.
AI Analysis
The Poly Voyager 4320 and Monster Mission 200 are both wireless headphones, with the Poly Voyager priced at $115.99 and offering a longer battery life of 24 hours compared to the Mission 200's 20 hours at $97.99. The Voyager 4320 is better suited for users who prioritize extended listening time, such as frequent travelers or long work sessions, while the Mission 200 provides a more budget-friendly option for casual listeners who still want reliable wireless performance.
Winner:🤝 Tie (depends on use case)
Ad
Comparison Table
| Spec | Poly Voyager 4320 | Monster Mission 200 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| $115.99 | $97.99 | ||
| Unknown | Unknown | = | |
| 40 mm | 40mm | = | |
| 24 hours | 20 hours | = | |
| SBC, AAC, aptX | AAC, SBC | = | |
| IPX4 | IPX4 | = | |
| 5.1 | 5.0 | = | |
| Active Noise Cancelling (ANC) | Active Noise Cancelling (ANC) | = | |
| Price | $115.99 | $29.99 | B |
Poly Voyager 4320
$115.99
Monster Mission 200
$97.99
Poly Voyager 4320
Unknown
Monster Mission 200
Unknown
Tie
Poly Voyager 4320
40 mm
Monster Mission 200
40mm
Tie
Poly Voyager 4320
24 hours
Monster Mission 200
20 hours
Tie
Poly Voyager 4320
SBC, AAC, aptX
Monster Mission 200
AAC, SBC
Tie
Poly Voyager 4320
IPX4
Monster Mission 200
IPX4
Tie
Poly Voyager 4320
5.1
Monster Mission 200
5.0
Tie
Poly Voyager 4320
Active Noise Cancelling (ANC)
Monster Mission 200
Active Noise Cancelling (ANC)
Tie
Price
Poly Voyager 4320
$115.99
Monster Mission 200
$29.99
Ad
Vote Statistics
Which product do you prefer? Share your opinion and see what others think!
Vote Statistics
Total Votes (0)
Poly Voyager 43200 votes (0%)
Monster Mission 2000 votes (0%)
Ad
Pros & Cons
Poly Voyager 4320
Pros
- Longer battery life of 24 hours compared to 20 hours for Product B.
- Supports aptX codec, providing better audio quality for compatible devices.
- Bluetooth version 5.1 offers improved connectivity and range over version 5.0.
Cons
- Higher price point at $115.99 compared to $97.99 for Product B.
Ad
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Poly Voyager 4320 if:
- Longer battery life of 24 hours compared to 20 hours for Product B.
- Supports aptX codec, providing better audio quality for compatible devices.
- Bluetooth version 5.1 offers improved connectivity and range over version 5.0.
Choose Monster Mission 200 if:
- Lower price at $97.99, making it more budget-friendly than Product A.
- Both products have similar water resistance ratings (IPX4), providing good durability.
- Active Noise Cancelling (ANC) feature is present, comparable to Product A.
Best Prices
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for gaming: Poly Voyager 4320 or Monster Mission 200?
The Poly Voyager 4320 and Monster Mission 200 are both wireless headphones, with the Poly Voyager priced at $115.99 and offering a longer battery life of 24 hours compared to the Mission 200's 20 hours at $97.99. The Voyager 4320 is better suited for users who prioritize extended listening time, such as frequent travelers or long work sessions, while the Mission 200 provides a more budget-friendly option for casual listeners who still want reliable wireless performance.
What is the price difference between Poly Voyager 4320 and Monster Mission 200?
Poly Voyager 4320 costs $116 while Monster Mission 200 costs $30, making a difference of $86.
Are Poly Voyager 4320 and Monster Mission 200 from the same brand?
Yes, both are from null.

