ASTRO A20 Gen 2 vs Monster Mission 200
Updated: Dec 2, 2025
ASTRO A20 Gen 2
$90
VS
Monster Mission 200
$30
Disclosure: This page contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you make a purchase, at no additional cost to you.
AI Analysis
The ASTRO A20 Gen 2 and Monster Mission 200 are both wireless headphones, but they differ significantly in battery life and price. The ASTRO A20 Gen 2 offers 15 hours of battery life at a lower price of $89.99, making it a suitable choice for casual users who prioritize affordability. In contrast, the Monster Mission 200 provides a longer battery life of 20 hours for $97.99, which may appeal to users who require extended usage for travel or long listening sessions.
Winner:🤝 Tie (depends on use case)
Ad
Comparison Table
| Spec | ASTRO A20 Gen 2 | Monster Mission 200 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| $89.99 | $97.99 | ||
| Unknown | Unknown | = | |
| 40 mm | 40mm | = | |
| 15 hours | 20 hours | = | |
| AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC | = | |
| IPX4 | IPX4 | = | |
| 5.0 | 5.0 | = | |
| Passive noise isolation | Active Noise Cancelling (ANC) | = | |
| Price | $89.99 | $29.99 | B |
ASTRO A20 Gen 2
$89.99
Monster Mission 200
$97.99
ASTRO A20 Gen 2
Unknown
Monster Mission 200
Unknown
Tie
ASTRO A20 Gen 2
40 mm
Monster Mission 200
40mm
Tie
ASTRO A20 Gen 2
15 hours
Monster Mission 200
20 hours
Tie
ASTRO A20 Gen 2
AAC, SBC
Monster Mission 200
AAC, SBC
Tie
ASTRO A20 Gen 2
IPX4
Monster Mission 200
IPX4
Tie
ASTRO A20 Gen 2
5.0
Monster Mission 200
5.0
Tie
ASTRO A20 Gen 2
Passive noise isolation
Monster Mission 200
Active Noise Cancelling (ANC)
Tie
Price
ASTRO A20 Gen 2
$89.99
Monster Mission 200
$29.99
Ad
Vote Statistics
Which product do you prefer? Share your opinion and see what others think!
Vote Statistics
Total Votes (0)
ASTRO A20 Gen 20 votes (0%)
Monster Mission 2000 votes (0%)
Ad
Pros & Cons
ASTRO A20 Gen 2
Pros
- Lower price at $89.99 makes it more budget-friendly compared to Product B.
- Lightweight design with passive noise isolation is suitable for casual listening.
- Good battery life of 15 hours is adequate for daily use.
Cons
- Lacks active noise cancelling, which may be a drawback for users seeking immersive sound.
Ad
Which Should You Choose?
Choose ASTRO A20 Gen 2 if:
- Lower price at $89.99 makes it more budget-friendly compared to Product B.
- Lightweight design with passive noise isolation is suitable for casual listening.
- Good battery life of 15 hours is adequate for daily use.
Choose Monster Mission 200 if:
- Features active noise cancelling, providing superior sound isolation and an enhanced listening experience.
- Longer battery life of 20 hours allows for extended use without frequent recharging.
- Same driver size and codec support as Product A, ensuring good sound quality.
Best Prices
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for gaming: ASTRO A20 Gen 2 or Monster Mission 200?
The ASTRO A20 Gen 2 and Monster Mission 200 are both wireless headphones, but they differ significantly in battery life and price. The ASTRO A20 Gen 2 offers 15 hours of battery life at a lower price of $89.99, making it a suitable choice for casual users who prioritize affordability. In contrast, the Monster Mission 200 provides a longer battery life of 20 hours for $97.99, which may appeal to users who require extended usage for travel or long listening sessions.
What is the price difference between ASTRO A20 Gen 2 and Monster Mission 200?
ASTRO A20 Gen 2 costs $90 while Monster Mission 200 costs $30, making a difference of $60.
Are ASTRO A20 Gen 2 and Monster Mission 200 from the same brand?
Yes, both are from null.